1. Sample Size Does Not Turn a Discrete Variable into a Continuous One
Curriculum location: Random Variables and Unconditional Expectations, Random Variables and Their Properties, printed p. 253.
"When the number of observations is large, the distributions will converge to continuous distributions."
The number of observations and the variable's support are different ideas. A binomial count remains discrete even with a very large sample, while a measured return can be modeled continuously even in a small sample.
Correct reading: A random variable is discrete when its possible values are countable and continuous when its possible values fill a continuum. Increasing sample size does not change that classification.
A candidate who follows the printed rule could misclassify count data solely because the dataset is large.
2. CDFs, PDFs, and Interval Probabilities Are Not Interchangeable
Curriculum location: Random Variables and Unconditional Expectations, Exhibit 3, printed p. 255.
"The CDF ... illustrates the ... cumulative proportion of returns, summing to a total area of 1."
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Exhibit 19, printed p. 280.
Curriculum location: Conditional Expectations, Variances, and Covariances, Exhibit 21 and Equation 23, printed p. 283.
"Equation 23 is the joint density function."
These statements exchange density, accumulated probability, and interval probability. A PDF is a density; its integral over an interval is a probability. A CDF is the accumulated probability up to a point. In the joint example, is the density and its double integral is , the CDF.
Correct reading: , when differentiable, and . The mound in Exhibit 21 is a joint PDF, while Equation 23 defines the joint CDF.
A candidate could otherwise integrate, differentiate, or label the wrong probability function.
3. The Discrete-Uniform Variance Formula Needs a Unit-Spacing Condition
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Discrete Uniform Distribution and Exhibit 18, printed pp. 266 and 279.
"there are evenly spaced outcomes ... with spacing "
The prose permits any equal spacing, but the displayed variance is the special formula for consecutive integers.
Correct reading: For equally spaced points from to , . The printed formula applies only when the spacing is one, so .
A candidate could use the wrong variance when the support is equally spaced but not consecutive.
4. The Stock-Price and Return Distributions Are Reversed
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Monte Carlo Simulation of Stock Prices, printed p. 272.
"For stock prices, this target distribution is often the normal distribution, due to the assumption of log-normal returns."
The standard log-normal price model uses the opposite relationship: the logarithm of the price relative is normal, so the price level is log-normal.
Correct reading: Under geometric Brownian motion, stock price levels are log-normal and continuously compounded returns are normal.
A candidate could select the normal distribution for a price level when the log-normal distribution is required.
5. Brownian Increments Must Be Scaled by the Square Root of the Time Step
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Monte Carlo Simulation of Stock Prices, printed p. 273.
"Use the result from Step 2 as in the GBM formula."
A standard-normal draw has unit variance, while a Brownian increment over has variance .
Correct reading: Draw and set . For , the printed price 9.818 follows only after scaling the draw by .
A candidate who inserts directly would overstate one-day volatility by a factor of .
6. A Final Price of 11.09 Does Not Imply an 11.09% Return
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Monte Carlo Simulation of Stock Prices, Exhibit 14 discussion, printed p. 273.
"The average simulated final price is 11.09, implying an 11.09% return"
The exhibit starts the simulated paths at 10. A price level and a return are different objects: the return is the change from the initial price divided by that initial price.
Correct reading: With an initial price of 10 and a final price of 11.09, the return is .
A candidate could otherwise mistake the final price level for a percentage and overstate the simulated gain.
7. Log Returns Are Unbounded
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Log-Normal Distribution, printed p. 275.
"Logarithmic returns ... are bounded"
For strictly positive prices, can be any real number. It is the price level that is bounded below by zero, not the log return.
Correct reading: Log returns are unbounded. Their multi-period advantage is additivity: log returns sum across periods.
A candidate could otherwise confuse the support of a price level with the support of its log return.
8. The Log-Normal Price Case Mixes Drift, Mean Log Return, and Median Price
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Modeling Asset Prices case, printed p. 276.
", the mean of the logarithmic annual return = 8%"
, followed by
The case then subtracts , which is appropriate when denotes GBM arithmetic drift, not when it already denotes the mean log return. It also exponentiates the mean log price and calls the result the future price, although that exponential is the log-normal median.
Correct reading: If is mean log return, . If is GBM arithmetic drift, , , and .
A candidate could apply the volatility adjustment to the wrong parameter or call a median an expectation.
9. The Uniform-CDF Spreadsheet Formula Is Invalid
Curriculum location: Key Statistical Distributions in Finance, Exhibit 20 and following note, printed pp. 280-281.
The expression omits required distribution arguments and then divides the incomplete function result by the interval width.
Correct reading: For , use , with 0 below and 1 above . If is used, supply the complete current syntax for the relevant spreadsheet application.
A candidate could enter a formula that errors or returns the wrong probability.
10. Conditional Expectation Is Misidentified as a Conditional PDF
Curriculum location: Conditional Expectations, Variances, and Covariances, conditional-expectation section, printed p. 285.
"The calculation of the conditional PDF of given "
The equations immediately below compute conditional expected values, not a density function.
Correct reading: The lead-in should say "the calculation of the conditional expectation of given ."
A candidate could otherwise confuse a conditional mean with a conditional density.
11. Conditional Expectations Repeatedly Omit the Conditioning Bar
Curriculum location: Conditional Expectations, Variances, and Covariances, conditional-expectation examples, printed pp. 285-286.
Without the conditioning bar, the notation reads as juxtaposition or multiplication rather than an expectation under a condition.
Correct reading: Write and .
A candidate could omit the operator that distinguishes a conditional mean from an ordinary expectation or product.
12. The Total-Expectation Formula Uses a Probability Where It Needs an Expected Value
Curriculum location: Conditional Expectations, Variances, and Covariances, Equation 30, printed p. 287.
The rule recombines scenario-conditioned means. is an event-probability expression, not the conditional mean of a random variable.
Correct reading: .
A candidate could substitute probabilities for the returns or other numerical outcomes being averaged.
13. The Depression Mean Has the Wrong Sign in the Variance Calculation
Curriculum location: Conditional Expectations, Variances, and Covariances, portfolio scenario case, printed p. 288.
The case previously calculated the depression mean as , so the deviation must begin with .
Correct reading: Use . With the other two scenario means, the between-scenario variance is about , not .
A candidate could reproduce the wrong sign and understate the between-scenario variance.
14. The Unconditional Variance Omits Within-Scenario Risk
Curriculum location: Conditional Expectations, Variances, and Covariances, portfolio scenario case, printed p. 288.
Dispersion of the conditional means is only one component of total variance. The case has already computed nonzero variances inside each scenario, and those must also be included.
Correct reading: . Using the displayed inputs gives a total variance of about .
A candidate could understate portfolio risk by omitting all within-scenario dispersion.
15. Equal Priors Do Not Reverse Conditional Probabilities
Curriculum location: Bayesian Updating, diffuse-prior paragraph, printed p. 299.
"the probability of information given an event equals the probability of the event given the information."
Equal priors remove relative prior weighting, but the posterior still divides each likelihood by the sum of likelihoods across the exhaustive scenarios.
Correct reading: With equal priors, . In general, .
A candidate could reverse the conditioning direction in Bayes' theorem.
Complete Module 6 Body-Text Errata Index
Errata scope
- Curriculum: CFA Level I 2027 Curriculum
- Volume: Volume 1, Quantitative Methods
- Module: Module 6, Statistical Distributions for Financial Asset Prices and Returns
- Topics covered: Random Variables and Unconditional Expectations; Key Statistical Distributions in Finance; Conditional Expectations, Variances, and Covariances; Bayesian Updating
- Source reviewed: CFA Level I 2027 Curriculum, Volume 1, Module 6, printed pp. 249-307
The table below lists all confirmed source-authored body-text errors identified across the in-scope topics. Repeated instances of the same defect are consolidated into one row. Import-only defects, Knowledge Check and question-set issues, and product metadata defects are excluded.
Page references use the printed curriculum page numbers.
References
- NIST/SEMATECH: Probability distributions and related probability functions
- Penn State STAT 414: Discrete random variables and CDFs
- Penn State STAT 414: Continuous random variables, variance, and uniform distributions
- Penn State STAT 414: Mathematical expectation and variance
- NIST/SEMATECH: Binomial distribution
- NIST/SEMATECH: Lognormal distribution
- MIT OpenCourseWare: Brownian motion defining properties
- Microsoft Support: BETA.DIST function
- Google Docs Editors Help: BETA.DIST function
- Berkeley Statistics: Conditional variance and the law of total variance
- Penn State STAT 414: Bayes' theorem
This article is an independent candidate-focused analysis of confirmed errors in the CFA Level I 2027 Curriculum, Volume 1 Quantitative Methods, Module 6 Statistical Distributions for Financial Asset Prices and Returns. It is not an official curriculum errata notice.